🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy presents a flawed assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" policies pose an existential risk to European civilization. However, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true challenge confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the world’s top fifty technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Problem

The growing economic gap stems from superior efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech leadership is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap raises a vital issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does the EU positioned? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is divided among 27 different national regimes, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for major changes.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets could support far greater levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses considerable strengths: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring innovations from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive moment. As the saying goes, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in global economic relevance.